What Part 3 is, in one paragraph
Part 3 is the part of the Cambridge Speaking test where the interlocutor sets up a task and then steps back, so you talk only to the other candidate, and it is where Interactive Communication is mostly won or lost. At B2 First and C1 Advanced the interlocutor puts a sheet in front of you with a question in the middle and five written prompts around it, gives you about 15 seconds to read it, and asks you to "talk to each other" for about 2 minutes. Then a second question asks you to decide something in about 1 minute. The B2 First handbook says candidates "are not expected to discuss all five prompts", "are not penalised if they fail to reach a negotiated decision", and are assessed on "their ability to hold a conversation, to turn-take appropriately, and to use the language of negotiation and collaboration". So the plan is simple: fewer prompts in more depth, real back-and-forth, and a decision that is negotiated rather than announced. Cambridge's own lesson plan for C1 Speaking puts it in one line: "It is very important to interact with the other candidate in Part 3. You will get marks for this." This page gives you the plan second by second, 50 phrases grouped by job, a full worked exchange written by TalkDrill, and what Cambridge examiners actually credited in a published B2 First test.
- B2 First and C1 Advanced: about 15 seconds to read, a 2-minute discussion, a 1-minute decision. The whole part is 4 minutes for a pair.
- You do not have to cover all five prompts and you are not penalised for failing to agree.
- B1 Preliminary is a situation with pictures, about 2 to 3 minutes of talk, and you should discuss all the pictures.
- You are assessed individually, "not in relation to each other". Your partner's level does not set your mark.
- Part 4 follows straight on, with questions on the same topic: 4 minutes at B2, 5 at C1, 3 at B1.
The task at B1, B2 and C1, side by side
| Feature | B1 Preliminary | B2 First | C1 Advanced |
|---|---|---|---|
| What you see | A situation read by the interlocutor and a set of pictures | A central question with five written prompts around it | A central question with five written prompts around it |
| How it opens | "Now, in this part of the test you're going to talk about something together for about two minutes. I'm going to describe a situation to you." | "Now, I'd like you to talk about something together for about two minutes." Then: "First you have some time to look at the task." | The same, with "Here are some ... and a question for you to discuss." |
| Reading time | You look at the pictures while the situation is read | 15 seconds | About 15 seconds |
| Discussion | About 2 to 3 minutes; the part takes 4 minutes | 2 minutes (3 for a group of three) | 2 minutes (3 for a group of three) |
| Decision | Built into the task ("say which would be most ...") | A second question, about 1 minute | A second question, about 1 minute (2 for a group of three) |
| Cover every prompt? | Yes: "Candidates should discuss all the visual prompts" | No: "not expected to discuss all five prompts" | No: "There is no requirement to talk about all five prompts" |
| If you do not agree | "They are not assessed on whether they complete the task." | "not penalised if they fail to reach a negotiated decision" | "not penalised if they fail to reach a negotiated decision" |
The decision question is a different question from the discussion one, and it usually narrows the topic. In the handbook sample tasks, the B2 decision is "which of these things is most important if people want to eat healthily", and the C1 decision is "which two ways of communicating are the least effective". Listen for the number (one thing, or two?) and the angle (most important, least effective, easiest to change), because a decision that answers a different question is not relevant to the task.
Why a monologue costs Interactive Communication marks
Read the Interactive Communication descriptors and count the verbs that need another person. These are the Band 3 and Band 5 lines from the three handbooks.
| Exam | Band 3 | Band 5 |
|---|---|---|
| B1 Preliminary | "Initiates and responds appropriately. Keeps the interaction going with very little prompting and support." | "Initiates and responds appropriately. Maintains and develops the interaction and negotiates towards an outcome with very little support." |
| B2 First | "Initiates and responds appropriately. Maintains and develops the interaction and negotiates towards an outcome with very little support." | "Initiates and responds appropriately, linking contributions to those of other speakers. Maintains and develops the interaction and negotiates towards an outcome." |
| C1 Advanced | "Initiates and responds appropriately, linking contributions to those of other speakers. Maintains and develops the interaction and negotiates towards an outcome." | "Interacts with ease, linking contributions to those of other speakers. Widens the scope of the interaction and negotiates towards an outcome." |
Initiates, responds, links to other speakers, negotiates. A 60-second speech can be perfect English and still give the assessor no evidence for any of them. Here is what that looks like, written by TalkDrill to show the pattern:
The monologue (TalkDrill example)
Candidate A, for 55 seconds: "OK, so, cost, I think going abroad is more expensive because of flights and hotels. The environment, flying is bad for the planet, so it's better to stay at home. Learning about other cultures, you learn more abroad because everything is different. Language problems, if you don't speak the language it can be difficult but also it's an adventure. Time spent travelling, if the holiday is short you lose a lot of time at the airport. So I think it depends." Candidate B: "Yes, I agree."
A has covered every prompt and asked nothing. B has had nothing left to say and has only agreed. Both have lost evidence for Interactive Communication: A for never inviting or responding, B for never developing. And the C1 handbook names B's habit directly: "Simply agreeing or disagreeing with their partner, or echoing what their partner has said, while being a natural thing to do, will not enable them to show what they themselves can do."
What the examiners credited in a real B2 First test
Cambridge's published examiner comments for the B2 First Speaking test of Giulia, Tabatha and Elena (a group of three; PDF linked from the B2 First preparation page, read 21 October 2026) show interaction being scored separately from accuracy.
| Candidate | Interactive Communication | Other criteria | What the examiners wrote |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tabatha | 4 | 3.5 for Grammar and Vocabulary, Discourse Management, Pronunciation and Global Achievement | Her "attempt to start the discussion in the second phase of part 3 is less successful", but "elsewhere in part 3, she invites her partners to contribute their views and reacts appropriately to their contributions": "Between technology and education, what do you think would be the most important thing?" and "I totally agree with you; I take your point." |
| Elena | 4 | 4 on every criterion | "She also invites her partners to comment. (What about you?)" and shows "her ability to develop the interaction and to sum up the discussion in part 3": "OK, then, so we probably go with this one." |
| Giulia | 4 | 4 or 4.5 elsewhere (4.5 for Pronunciation) | She "initiates appropriately" but "doesn't always use language to explicitly invite her partners to contribute", although she uses "posture and eye contact for this purpose". |
Tabatha's Interactive Communication mark was the highest of her five marks, and the comments point to her questions to her partners. Giulia, whose English was stronger elsewhere, did not out-score her on interaction, and the comments name the gap: she did not always invite in words. Asking your partner a real question is the cheapest evidence for Interactive Communication you can give.
The 2 plus 1 minute plan
The structure comes from the handbooks; the second-by-second timings are TalkDrill's recommendation. Turns of roughly 10 to 20 seconds each keep the conversation moving and leave room for both of you, but they are our guide, not a Cambridge rule.
| Time | What you do | What it sounds like |
|---|---|---|
| 15 seconds reading | Read the central question twice. Pick two or three prompts you have something to say about. Plan only your first sentence. | (silence) |
| 0:00 to 0:15 | Open and invite. Whoever starts, end the first turn with a question. | "Shall we start with cost? ... What do you think?" |
| 0:15 to 1:30 | Three or four prompts in depth. Each turn: react to your partner, add an idea, give a reason. Ask a question every second turn or so. | "That's a good point, although ..." / "Which brings us to ..." |
| 1:30 to 2:00 | Link prompts, bring in one you have not covered, and keep going until "Thank you". Do not decide yet. | "That links to what you said about ..." |
| Decision 0:00 to 0:10 | Restate the decision question so you both answer the same thing. | "So, which is the most important when people choose ...?" |
| Decision 0:10 to 0:40 | Propose one option with a reason, as a question. Weigh it against your partner's choice. | "I'd go for ..., because ... Would you go along with that?" |
| Decision 0:40 to 1:00 | Agree, or agree to disagree with both reasons, and keep talking until "Thank you". | "Shall we say ..., then?" / "We don't quite agree, and that's fine: ..." |
The timing error to avoid is deciding in the discussion phase: "OK, so we agree cost is the most important" at 0:40, followed by a long silence. The decision has its own question and its own minute. Use the two minutes to explore.
The 50 phrases, by job
Phrases marked (handbook) are examples in the B2 First or C1 Advanced handbook; (lesson plan) means the official C1 Speaking Parts 3 and 4 lesson plan; (examiner comments) means a line Cambridge's examiners quoted with credit in the B2 commentary above. The rest are TalkDrill's. The lesson plan's advice is to "use a range of expressions to agree or disagree politely, ask questions and move the discussion on", and the C1 handbook suggests keeping a notebook of functional language and using "as many different ways of doing things as possible to avoid repetition". Pick two from each group.
Starting and organising (1 to 5)
| # | Phrase | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shall we start with this one? | handbook |
| 2 | Shall I start, or would you like to? | TalkDrill |
| 3 | Let's begin with ..., because it's probably the most obvious. | TalkDrill |
| 4 | Shall we take them one at a time? | TalkDrill |
| 5 | Maybe we could sort these into the big ones and the small ones. (C1) | TalkDrill |
Inviting your partner (6 to 12)
| # | Phrase | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | What do you think? | handbook |
| 7 | How do you feel about ...? | lesson plan |
| 8 | What about ...? | lesson plan |
| 9 | Which one do you think is ...? | lesson plan |
| 10 | What about you? | examiner comments |
| 11 | Do you see it the same way? | TalkDrill |
| 12 | Would you agree, or am I being too negative? | TalkDrill |
Agreeing, and adding something (13 to 18)
| # | Phrase | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | That's a very good point. | lesson plan |
| 14 | That's just what I was thinking. | lesson plan |
| 15 | I totally agree with you; I take your point. | examiner comments |
| 16 | Exactly, and on top of that ... | TalkDrill |
| 17 | I'd go along with that, and I'd add that ... | TalkDrill |
| 18 | I couldn't agree more, especially because ... | TalkDrill |
Never let an agreement phrase stand alone. "I agree" plus nothing is the echo the C1 handbook warns about; "I agree, and ..." is development.
Partly agreeing and disagreeing politely (19 to 25)
| # | Phrase | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | I'm with you on that, but some people might say ... | lesson plan |
| 20 | I see what you mean, but ... | TalkDrill |
| 21 | That's true up to a point, but ... | TalkDrill |
| 22 | I'm not so sure about that. For me, ... | TalkDrill |
| 23 | I'd look at it slightly differently. | TalkDrill |
| 24 | Maybe, although doesn't that depend on ...? | TalkDrill |
| 25 | I take your point, but I'd still argue that ... (C1) | TalkDrill |
Linking and referring back (26 to 30)
| # | Phrase | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | ... but going back to your point about ... | lesson plan |
| 27 | That links to what you said about ... | TalkDrill |
| 28 | That's connected to this one here, actually. | TalkDrill |
| 29 | As you said earlier, ... | TalkDrill |
| 30 | Building on that, ... | TalkDrill |
Linking is the line that separates Band 3 from Band 5 at B2 ("linking contributions to those of other speakers"). One "going back to your point about" in two minutes is clear evidence of it.
Moving on and managing time (31 to 35)
| # | Phrase | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 31 | Shall we move on to ...? | handbook |
| 32 | Let's not spend too long on this one. | TalkDrill |
| 33 | We haven't talked about ... yet. | TalkDrill |
| 34 | Which brings us to ... | TalkDrill |
| 35 | Can we come back to that in a moment? | TalkDrill |
Thinking time (36 to 38)
| # | Phrase | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 36 | Well, ... | handbook |
| 37 | Let me see ... | handbook |
| 38 | Now, ... | handbook |
The C1 handbook recommends these "to give themselves time to think" but adds "not to over-use these as this will limit their range of language". One per minute is plenty.
Bringing in a quiet partner, and coming in on a busy one (39 to 43)
| # | Phrase | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 39 | You've been quiet on this one. What's your view? | TalkDrill |
| 40 | Which of these would you choose, if it were up to you? | TalkDrill |
| 41 | Sorry, can I just come in here? | TalkDrill |
| 42 | That's interesting. Can I add something? | TalkDrill |
| 43 | Let me just finish this point, and then I'd love to hear yours. | TalkDrill |
Negotiating the decision (44 to 50)
| # | Phrase | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 44 | So, which one shall we choose? | TalkDrill |
| 45 | I'd go for ..., because ... Would you go along with that? | TalkDrill |
| 46 | Unless you'd rather ...? | TalkDrill |
| 47 | So we agree on ... and ... | lesson plan (model answer) |
| 48 | OK, then, so we probably go with this one. | examiner comments |
| 49 | Shall we say ..., then? | TalkDrill |
| 50 | It seems we don't quite agree, and that's fine: I'd still say ..., and you'd choose ... | TalkDrill |
The official lesson plan's model decision minute ends without a full decision: the candidates "agree on two ideas but run out of time to agree on a third", and the answer key says "This is not necessary, however. They complete the task very well". Negotiating is the skill; the verdict is optional.
A worked exchange, B2 First (TalkDrill)
Interlocutor: "Now, I'd like you to talk about something together for about two minutes. Some people say it's better to go on holiday in your own country than to travel abroad. Here are some things they think about, and a question for you to discuss. First you have some time to look at the task." (15 seconds) "Now, talk to each other about whether it's better to go on holiday in your own country than abroad."
Central question: Is it better to go on holiday in your own country than abroad? Prompts: cost / the environment / learning about other cultures / language problems / time spent travelling.
Decision question (after two minutes): "Now you have about a minute to decide which of these things is most important when people choose where to go on holiday."
The two-minute discussion
| Line (TalkDrill model, not a real candidate) | What it shows |
|---|---|
| A: Shall we start with cost? I'd say that's the first thing most families think about. A week at home is usually cheaper, because there are no flights. What do you think? | Initiates, gives a reason, invites (phrases 1 and 6) |
| B: Mostly, yes, but not always. Sometimes a flight to another country is cheaper than a train to the other end of mine. | Partial agreement with a counter-example |
| A: That's a good point, especially with budget airlines. Although that brings in the environment, doesn't it? A cheap flight isn't cheap for the planet. | Responds, then links two prompts with a question tag |
| B: True. I try to take the train when I can, but it's hard when it costs twice as much. | Develops with a personal angle |
| A: So cost and the environment pull in opposite directions. What about learning about other cultures? For me, that's the main reason to go abroad. | Summarises, moves on, states a position |
| B: I'm not so sure. You can learn a lot about other cultures in your own country. Where I live, the north and the south feel almost like two different countries. | Polite disagreement with an example (phrase 22) |
| A: I see what you mean. I hadn't thought of it like that. But the language is usually the same, so it's not quite the same challenge. | Concedes, then counters (phrase 20) |
| B: Which brings us to language problems. Do you think they're a reason to stay at home? | Links to the next prompt and asks a real question |
| A: Not really. A few problems are part of the fun. You remember the day you got lost far more than the museum. | Answers with a reason and a concrete detail |
| B: That's just what I was thinking, actually. My best holiday memory is trying to order food with a phrasebook. | Agrees and adds, rather than echoing (phrase 14) |
| Interlocutor: Thank you. | Two minutes. Four prompts covered, one left. That is fine. |
The one-minute decision
| Line (TalkDrill model) | What it shows |
|---|---|
| Interlocutor: Now you have about a minute to decide which of these things is most important when people choose where to go on holiday. | |
| B: So, which is the most important? I'd go for time spent travelling, which we didn't get to. If you only have four days, losing one of them at airports is a real waste. Would you go along with that? | Restates the question, brings in the uncovered prompt, proposes as a question (phrase 45) |
| A: For a short trip, definitely. But for most families I'd still say cost, because it decides everything else, even how long you can go for. | Partial agreement, counter-proposal with a reason |
| B: Hmm, so in a way cost includes time. A faster train costs more, too. | Links the two options: negotiation, not repetition |
| A: Exactly. Shall we say cost, then, with time spent travelling a close second? | Proposes the outcome (phrase 49) |
| B: Yes, let's say cost. | Agreement reached; if time allows, either can add why the environment came lower |
Count the evidence: A asks two questions and B asks three; each refers back to the other at least twice; one prompt is left uncovered and then used to open the decision. Neither speaks for more than about 15 seconds at a time. None of the English is beyond B2, which is the point: Interactive Communication is earned by what you do with your partner, not by difficult vocabulary.
The C1 difference in one decision minute (TalkDrill)
At C1 the Band 5 descriptor adds "Interacts with ease" and "Widens the scope of the interaction". Here is a short decision exchange for a C1 task about ways a city could make life better for older residents (prompts: free public transport, more benches and public toilets, digital skills classes, shared housing with students, community lunch clubs); decision question: which two would make the biggest difference.
C1 decision minute (TalkDrill model)
A: Before we pick two, can I raise something? "Older residents" covers someone of sixty-five who still works and someone of ninety who rarely leaves home. Which group are we choosing for?
B: That's a fair distinction. I'd say the ones most at risk of isolation, so the older group.
A: Then free transport matters less than I first thought, because they may not be travelling much. The lunch clubs and the benches would reach them more directly.
B: I'm with you on the lunch clubs, but some people might say benches are a bit trivial. Wouldn't shared housing do more against loneliness?
A: It might, for the few who'd accept it. Benches sound trivial, but if there's nowhere to rest, a ten-minute walk to the shop becomes impossible. Shall we say lunch clubs and benches, then, and accept that housing is the more ambitious idea?
B: Agreed, lunch clubs and benches.
The move that makes this C1 is the first line: instead of choosing, A questions the terms of the decision, and both candidates then use that distinction to justify the choice. That is what "widens the scope of the interaction" sounds like.
If your partner talks too much, or hardly at all
You cannot choose your partner, and the B2 handbook notes that candidates from different schools may be paired together at the same centre. The good news is in the assessment rules: candidates are "assessed on their own individual performance and not in relation to each other". A difficult partner is an opportunity to show interaction skills, as long as you stay polite.
- If your partner says almost nothing: ask open questions about specific prompts (phrases 39 and 40), react warmly to whatever they say, and build on it. Keep contributing as well: the C1 handbook says strategies that invite a partner in should not "give the impression that they are relying on their partner to do all the work". Filling the silence with your own monologue is the opposite mistake.
- If your partner talks too much: wait for a breath and come in with phrase 41 or 42, connect to their last point, then hand the turn back with a question. The C1 handbook suggests teachers practise exactly this, acting out a partner who either "constantly interrupt[s]" or says "almost nothing at all" so students learn to deal politely with both.
- If you are the strong one: the B2 handbook suggests one student in each practice group be responsible "for ensuring that every member of the group gets an equal opportunity to speak". Do that job in the exam and it counts as interaction.
- If the conversation stops: at B1 the handbook says the interlocutor "will help to redirect the candidates but will not take part in the task itself". At any level, the quickest restart is phrase 33: "We haven't talked about ... yet."
From Part 3 into Part 4
Part 4 follows Part 3 without a break and develops its topic: 4 minutes at B2 First, 5 at C1 Advanced and a 3-minute general conversation at B1 Preliminary. The B2 handbook says Part 4 questions "ask primarily for an evaluation rather than for information", and the interlocutor may turn to your partner with "What do you think?", "Do you agree?" or "And you?" (at C1, "How about you?"). Two habits carry over from Part 3. First, refer back: "As we said in the last task, ..." shows you are building on the conversation. Second, respond to your partner's Part 4 answer when invited, with a reason, rather than starting fresh. The official lesson plan's Part 4 tip is to "listen to your partner and be prepared to comment or react to what they have said if asked". The bank has Part 4 sets that follow its Part 3 tasks: B2-09, B2-10, C1-09 and C1-10.
First-language habits that affect interaction
These notes are TalkDrill's judgement, drawn from our research on Cambridge candidates' first languages, not Cambridge data. Every group below includes excellent communicators; the point is to know which habit to watch in your own recordings.
| First language | Habit to watch in Part 3 | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Spanish and Catalan | Flat intonation on questions to the partner, so an invitation sounds like a statement; "I am agree with you" | Let the voice rise on yes/no questions ("Do you see it the same way?"); "I agree with you" |
| Italian | Long, energetic turns that cover three prompts at once; "I am agree" | One prompt per turn, then a question back |
| Portuguese | "I think yes" and "I think no" as whole answers | "I think so, because ..." / "I don't think so, because ..." |
| Turkish | Reasons first and opinion last, so the partner cannot tell where the turn is going; few questions to the partner | Opinion first, reason second, question third |
| Vietnamese | Short turns and waiting to be asked, which can read as not initiating | Plan to start one prompt yourself, and use phrase 6 or 7 every second turn |
| Polish | Articles dropped inside the phrases you repeat most ("What about environment?", "Let's start with first one") | Learn each Part 3 phrase with its article in place, and say it aloud until it is fixed |
More, with drills, on the pages for Spanish, Italian and Portuguese speakers and Turkish and Vietnamese speakers.
Practise Part 3 with a partner or the AI
Part 3 cannot be fully practised alone, so build the week around another voice.
- Record one task with a partner. Use bank task B2-06 at B2 or C1-06 at C1, timed: 15 seconds, 2 minutes, 1 minute. Count your questions to your partner. Fewer than two in the discussion is the first thing to fix.
- No partner? Use the AI. In TalkDrill's role-play practice, describe the situation ("Cambridge B2 First Speaking Part 3; you are my partner, Candidate B") and paste the task and the partner side from the bank. Run your own timer.
- Train coming in. The group discussion mode puts you in a timed round with several AI participants who talk over each other. It is rougher than Cambridge Part 3, which is a polite two-person task, but practising phrases 41 to 43 there makes them automatic.
- Work through the bank's Part 3 tasks: B1-06 to B1-10, B2-06 to B2-08 and C1-05 to C1-08, each twice with roles swapped.
- Read the official lesson plan, C1 Advanced Speaking Parts 3 and 4 (useful at B2 too), and watch a Speaking test video on the B2 First or C1 Advanced preparation page with the examiner comments open.
For the long turn before it, see the Part 2 phrase page; for how the four criteria and Global Achievement turn into a grade, see the criteria and scale page. If your paper-based exam is B2 First on 7 November, 24 November or 12 December 2026, or C1 Advanced in November or December, check your Speaking date with your centre: the official dates page says Speaking test dates "are subject to local provision", so it can be a different day. All Cambridge pages are on the Cambridge English hub. Format checked against the B2 First exam-format page on 21 October 2026 and the C1 Advanced exam-format page.