Campus placements favour a few branches — is that fair?
In many colleges, computer science and IT students see ten times the number of recruiters that mechanical or civil students do, from the same placement cell and the same fee structure.
An intermediate-level session of about 10 minutes. You join 3 other speakers already in the discussion. You get 60 seconds to prepare before it starts.
The word doing all the work here is "fair", and a group that never pins it down will circle for ten minutes. At least three readings are available — equal recruiters per branch, equal effort from the cell, equal outcome — and choosing one out loud early gives everyone something they can actually disagree with. Underneath sits a fact neither side enjoys: a placement cell routes demand, it does not create it. Take the market side and you have to answer what the fee structure buys a civil student, which is the hardest question available in this room. If you are from one of the branches on the wrong end of it, your experience is the most concrete material anyone has, so spend it early rather than saving it.
Angles worth taking
- Pick one meaning of "fair" and say which you are using; the circle starts when nobody does.
- A placement cell routes demand rather than creating it — that fact cuts against both sides.
- Same fees, a tenth of the recruiters is the sharpest question here. Make someone answer it.
- Proposals beat grievances: branch-agnostic drives, cross-training, separate targets per stream.
- If you are from mechanical or civil, lead with the specific, not with how unfair it felt.
Ready to speak?
Free to start. You need a TalkDrill account to speak — reading this page does not.
Browse all group discussion topicsThe format
Speakers in the room
You plus 3 other speakers
Preparation time
60 seconds
Modes
Learn (guided) · Mock (exam-real)
How a group discussion session works
Read the situation
You get the topic and the real disagreement behind it — who wants what, and why the obvious answer is not obvious. No hunting for context.
Take your prep time
A short prep clock, the same as a real round. Enough to pick a position and one example. Not enough to write a speech, which is the point.
Get into the discussion
The AI participants open with their own positions and keep going. You enter when you find the gap, name what you are adding, and hold your turn.
Read the report
How much of the discussion was yours, whether you built on others or restarted, your fluency and clarity, and the two things to fix next time.
What you're scored on
A GD panel is not scoring the topic. Across every discussion below, the same four things decide the result, and they are what the report measures.
Contribute real points, build on what others say, and hold your share of the discussion without dominating it.
Content
Whether your points are real — an example, a number, a consequence — or a restatement of the topic in longer words.
Entry and airtime
Whether you got in at all, how often, and whether you held your share without running the whole room.
Listening
Whether you answered what was actually said. Building on someone, or disagreeing with their point specifically, scores far above a prepared line.
Delivery
Pace, clarity and steadiness under interruption — the part that decides whether a good point survives being made.
More group discussion topics
All group discussion topics · Campus topics · All speaking practice