Colleges should ban phones inside the classroom
A phone is a distraction, a dictionary, a calculator, a recorder and the only computer many students own.
A beginner-level session of about 10 minutes. You join 2 other speakers already in the discussion. You get 45 seconds to prepare before it starts.
Ban topics have a shape: the first four speakers say distraction, the next two say but I use it to look things up, and everyone waits for the bell. The line that actually divides opinion is not phone versus no phone, it is who decides — a rule the college enforces, or a norm the lecturer sets for their own room. That distinction is available in the first thirty seconds and almost nobody takes it. There is a second point sitting unused: for a large number of students the phone is not a second screen but the only computer they own, which turns a discipline question into an access question. Bring that up and the discussion stops being about attention spans.
Angles worth taking
- Shift from whether to ban to who decides — college policy or the lecturer of that room.
- For many students the phone is the only computer they own. That changes the topic entirely.
- Distraction arguments are unfalsifiable in the abstract; ask what a lecture hall actually looks like.
- Recording a lecture is an accessibility need for some students, not a convenience.
- Proposing enforcement is the fastest way to expose whether a ban was ever practical.
Ready to speak?
Free to start. You need a TalkDrill account to speak — reading this page does not.
Browse all group discussion topicsThe format
Speakers in the room
You plus 2 other speakers
Preparation time
45 seconds
Modes
Learn (guided) · Mock (exam-real)
How a group discussion session works
Read the situation
You get the topic and the real disagreement behind it — who wants what, and why the obvious answer is not obvious. No hunting for context.
Take your prep time
A short prep clock, the same as a real round. Enough to pick a position and one example. Not enough to write a speech, which is the point.
Get into the discussion
The AI participants open with their own positions and keep going. You enter when you find the gap, name what you are adding, and hold your turn.
Read the report
How much of the discussion was yours, whether you built on others or restarted, your fluency and clarity, and the two things to fix next time.
What you're scored on
A GD panel is not scoring the topic. Across every discussion below, the same four things decide the result, and they are what the report measures.
Contribute real points, build on what others say, and hold your share of the discussion without dominating it.
Content
Whether your points are real — an example, a number, a consequence — or a restatement of the topic in longer words.
Entry and airtime
Whether you got in at all, how often, and whether you held your share without running the whole room.
Listening
Whether you answered what was actually said. Building on someone, or disagreeing with their point specifically, scores far above a prepared line.
Delivery
Pace, clarity and steadiness under interruption — the part that decides whether a good point survives being made.
More group discussion topics
All group discussion topics · Campus topics · All speaking practice